Difference between revisions of "Talk:Physical size"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ion frigate (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'Does anyone know what the cutoff is for "small" versus "large" monsters when it comes to weapon damage? My guess is that Medium and under are "small", and Large and above are "l…') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does anyone know what the cutoff is for "small" versus "large" monsters when it comes to weapon damage? My guess is that Medium and under are "small", and Large and above are "large", but it's not unambiguous (Dmg vs. small could be interpreted to mean just Small and Tiny). -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 20:18, March 7, 2010 (UTC) | Does anyone know what the cutoff is for "small" versus "large" monsters when it comes to weapon damage? My guess is that Medium and under are "small", and Large and above are "large", but it's not unambiguous (Dmg vs. small could be interpreted to mean just Small and Tiny). -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 20:18, March 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :With 15 strength, basic in dagger, and a +0 Elven dagger, I was able to do 4 damage in one hit to a gray elf. The dagger does 1d3 to large and 1d5 to small, so unless I messed up the test, size medium is considered small. -- [[User:Qazmlpok|Qazmlpok]] 21:28, March 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:28, 7 March 2010
Does anyone know what the cutoff is for "small" versus "large" monsters when it comes to weapon damage? My guess is that Medium and under are "small", and Large and above are "large", but it's not unambiguous (Dmg vs. small could be interpreted to mean just Small and Tiny). -Ion frigate 20:18, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
- With 15 strength, basic in dagger, and a +0 Elven dagger, I was able to do 4 damage in one hit to a gray elf. The dagger does 1d3 to large and 1d5 to small, so unless I messed up the test, size medium is considered small. -- Qazmlpok 21:28, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
