Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rumor messages"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Rumor Messages to Talk:Rumor messages: Uncapitalize "messages".) |
|
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 12:31, 11 January 2010
Isn't this basically the same as true rumors? --paxed 12:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Yep, you're right. I didn't know that true rumors existed. I didn't see it on the Messages category page. I put together my (incomplete) list a couple of years ago, and never got around to publishing it. I'll mark my page to be deleted, and then see if I have any info that I should put in true rumors. Shouldn't true rumors be in the Messages category? -- User:LarryF LarryF 15:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- I actually like your version better (the table-format is good, IMO) --paxed 18:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- I think "Source:True rumors" is quite a misnomer. An ordinary user will not look under Source:. Therefore, I advocate completing this page and then removing the comments from True rumors. -Tjr 15:52, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
