Difference between revisions of "Talk:Samurai"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(polearms are definitely two-handed) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
-- [[User:PraetorFenix|PraetorFenix]] 15:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | -- [[User:PraetorFenix|PraetorFenix]] 15:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
:The spoiler may have been trying to say polearms are a good ''backup'' weapon, rather than a good weapon to wield in your left hand. --[[User:Jayt|Jayt]] 22:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | :The spoiler may have been trying to say polearms are a good ''backup'' weapon, rather than a good weapon to wield in your left hand. --[[User:Jayt|Jayt]] 22:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | "Samurai don't have the magic resistance intrinsic" | ||
| + | |||
| + | What's that trying to say? That the samurai artifact doesn't provide MR? | ||
Revision as of 17:44, 28 December 2006
In a previous version of this article I said " a bardiche, halberd, or even a spetum are good secondary weapons." (for two-weapon combat). I took this on good faith from a spoiler site. However, are'nt polearms 2 handed weapons? How are you supposed to double wield a polearm and a sword, or was the spoiler incorrect?
-- PraetorFenix 15:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- The spoiler may have been trying to say polearms are a good backup weapon, rather than a good weapon to wield in your left hand. --Jayt 22:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
"Samurai don't have the magic resistance intrinsic"
What's that trying to say? That the samurai artifact doesn't provide MR?
