Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spoiler"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ion frigate (talk | contribs) (Created page with '==Unspoiled ascension== Does anyone else think it's a good idea if this article merely comments on the possibility of an unspoiled ascension, without reference to the notion of a…') |
Ion frigate (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Unspoiled ascension== | ==Unspoiled ascension== | ||
| − | Does anyone else think it's a good idea if this article merely comments on the possibility of an unspoiled ascension, without reference to the notion of a "documented unspoiled ascension | + | Does anyone else think it's a good idea if this article merely comments on the possibility of an unspoiled ascension, without reference to the notion of a "documented unspoiled ascension"? There's no way to prove such a thing, and it's very difficult to disprove it as well. And I don't think it's a good idea to have anything in the article about "claimed unspoiled ascensions" either, as that is annoyingly legalistic. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 01:53, July 12, 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:54, 12 July 2010
Unspoiled ascension
Does anyone else think it's a good idea if this article merely comments on the possibility of an unspoiled ascension, without reference to the notion of a "documented unspoiled ascension"? There's no way to prove such a thing, and it's very difficult to disprove it as well. And I don't think it's a good idea to have anything in the article about "claimed unspoiled ascensions" either, as that is annoyingly legalistic. -Ion frigate 01:53, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
