Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spoiler"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ion frigate (talk | contribs) (Created page with '==Unspoiled ascension== Does anyone else think it's a good idea if this article merely comments on the possibility of an unspoiled ascension, without reference to the notion of a…') |
(→Unspoiled ascension) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Unspoiled ascension== | ==Unspoiled ascension== | ||
| − | Does anyone else think it's a good idea if this article merely comments on the possibility of an unspoiled ascension, without reference to the notion of a "documented unspoiled ascension | + | Does anyone else think it's a good idea if this article merely comments on the possibility of an unspoiled ascension, without reference to the notion of a "documented unspoiled ascension"? There's no way to prove such a thing, and it's very difficult to disprove it as well. And I don't think it's a good idea to have anything in the article about "claimed unspoiled ascensions" either, as that is annoyingly legalistic. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 01:53, July 12, 2010 (UTC) |
| + | : I'd like to keep the link. It's interesting even if we can't prove or disprove it. --[[User:Slandor|Slandor]] 02:51, July 12, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:51, 12 July 2010
Unspoiled ascension
Does anyone else think it's a good idea if this article merely comments on the possibility of an unspoiled ascension, without reference to the notion of a "documented unspoiled ascension"? There's no way to prove such a thing, and it's very difficult to disprove it as well. And I don't think it's a good idea to have anything in the article about "claimed unspoiled ascensions" either, as that is annoyingly legalistic. -Ion frigate 01:53, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
- I'd like to keep the link. It's interesting even if we can't prove or disprove it. --Slandor 02:51, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
