Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unofficial conduct"
(→Let's remove junk: new section) |
(→Inventoryless again: new section) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Any opinions? --[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 14:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC) | Any opinions? --[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 14:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Inventoryless again == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Seriously, does anybody actually attempt this? If not it should be removed from here. [[Special:Contributions/75.58.123.252|75.58.123.252]] 17:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:32, 18 September 2011
Contents
Toolless
If you want to get in to chests or large boxes, can #forcing the lock with a blunt weapon to attempt to destroy the container (and zapping a /oLocking if you fail) break this unofficial conduct? Would using the unused (deferred?) feature #tip to upend a bag of its contents also break it? -- Kalon 00:32, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Inventoryless
The inventoryless conduct sounds like an extremely difficult one. Has it ever been done? I think the article needs an example or two about this. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 23:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Zen
First zen rogue that I am avare of was "3.4.3 4331546 7 -5 49 161 161 0 20060806 20060802 1031 Rog Hum Mal Cha ix,ascended" at NAO. Before crash ttyrec: http://alt.org/nethack/getoldttyrec.php?player=ix starts from 145. and ascend in 152. --84.248.118.187 15:52, September 18, 2009 (UTC)
- Who was the player? If possible, would you please linkify the article to point to a reference for this ascension? -Tjr 15:32, September 18, 2009 (UTC)
Popular conducts
Are "inventoryless", "god's will" and "no identification" actually popular conducts? The first two in particular I've never really heard about, and I'm not sure they shouldn't be under "other conducts" instead. If noone objects, I'll go ahead and move these later. -- Schnee 12:30, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Go ahead. God's will and no ID are more or less exaggerated sub-challenges of neutral-atheist-pacifist and illiterate, respectively. Inventoryless does not look play-tested to me. Tjr 23:39, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Done. -- Schnee 18:44, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
Let's remove junk
Let's remove the "conducts" nobody is seriously pursuing or that are too hard. Or at least mark them. I suggest the bar for inclusing is a game reaching Medusa's.
As a corollary, conducts here should link to a successful game or ascension post.
Any opinions? --Tjr 14:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Inventoryless again
Seriously, does anybody actually attempt this? If not it should be removed from here. 75.58.123.252 17:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
