Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kahran042"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(gnolls in non-hell area: new section)
(gnolls in non-hell area)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
Gnolls might have the g_hell flag set, but they can still be generated in Throne Rooms, so technically they cannot be limited to only hell areas, no?
 
Gnolls might have the g_hell flag set, but they can still be generated in Throne Rooms, so technically they cannot be limited to only hell areas, no?
 
(was recently killed in a throne room by a gnoll, and have the scars to prove it)
 
(was recently killed in a throne room by a gnoll, and have the scars to prove it)
 +
*Ah. I see. I'm really more into theory than practice, and I guess I never bothered to check that section of the sources. :( --[[User:Kahran042|Kahran042]] 16:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:29, 22 August 2008

Thanks! Yes, that was my first ascension. I got lucky with wishes, but I think I could ascend again now that I've done it once. --Mogri 19:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Is your Lethe patch page a vanilla or SLASH'EM patch?

Some of the text of the page suggests it may be a SLASH'EM patch - this needs clarifying. See Talk:Gehennom (Lethe patch) --Rogerb-on-NAO 23:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

  • It's a patch for vanilla that was modified for SLASH'EM later as SLethe. --Kahran042 23:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

gnolls in non-hell area

Gnolls might have the g_hell flag set, but they can still be generated in Throne Rooms, so technically they cannot be limited to only hell areas, no? (was recently killed in a throne room by a gnoll, and have the scars to prove it)

  • Ah. I see. I'm really more into theory than practice, and I guess I never bothered to check that section of the sources. :( --Kahran042 16:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)