Difference between revisions of "Forum:Cursed ordinary sack - concern?"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
:Narp.  --[[User:Aheneve|Aheneve]] ([[User talk:Aheneve|talk]]) 22:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 
:Narp.  --[[User:Aheneve|Aheneve]] ([[User talk:Aheneve|talk]]) 22:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
:As far as I know, there are no issues with curses on an ordinary sack. [[User:Ais523|Ais523]] ([[User talk:Ais523|talk]]) 19:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
Not in Vanilla, but in [[UnNetHack]] a cursed bag doesn't protect its contents from the curse items spell - if the bag is targeted, a random item in the bag gets cursed instead.
 +
--[[User:Ozymandias|Ozymandias]] ([[User talk:Ozymandias|talk]]) 21:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:47, 15 January 2014


If a bag of holding is cursed, there's 33.3% chance that an item will disappear when taken out of the bag.

However, if its just an ordinary sack ... the wiki doesn't say its a problem. Should I bother wasting a cancellation charge on one?

Narp. --Aheneve (talk) 22:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
As far as I know, there are no issues with curses on an ordinary sack. Ais523 (talk) 19:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Not in Vanilla, but in UnNetHack a cursed bag doesn't protect its contents from the curse items spell - if the bag is targeted, a random item in the bag gets cursed instead. --Ozymandias (talk) 21:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)