Difference between revisions of "Forum:Cursed ordinary sack - concern?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I think it'll be fine) |
Ozymandias (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:As far as I know, there are no issues with curses on an ordinary sack. [[User:Ais523|Ais523]] ([[User talk:Ais523|talk]]) 19:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC) | :As far as I know, there are no issues with curses on an ordinary sack. [[User:Ais523|Ais523]] ([[User talk:Ais523|talk]]) 19:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Not in Vanilla, but in [[UnNetHack]] a cursed bag doesn't protect its contents from the curse items spell - if the bag is targeted, a random item in the bag gets cursed instead. | ||
| + | --[[User:Ozymandias|Ozymandias]] ([[User talk:Ozymandias|talk]]) 21:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:47, 15 January 2014
If a bag of holding is cursed, there's 33.3% chance that an item will disappear when taken out of the bag.
However, if its just an ordinary sack ... the wiki doesn't say its a problem. Should I bother wasting a cancellation charge on one?
- As far as I know, there are no issues with curses on an ordinary sack. Ais523 (talk) 19:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Not in Vanilla, but in UnNetHack a cursed bag doesn't protect its contents from the curse items spell - if the bag is targeted, a random item in the bag gets cursed instead. --Ozymandias (talk) 21:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
