Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alignment key (SLASH'EM)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Rename: new section) |
Ion frigate (talk | contribs) (Either that way or combine them into one article, with redirects to sections) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Given that both the alignment keys and quests are present in different branches of NetHack variants, would it make sense to start by moving this page to perhaps [[Alignment key (SLASH'EM)]]? --[[User:Umbire the Phantom|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom|talk]]) 07:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC) | Given that both the alignment keys and quests are present in different branches of NetHack variants, would it make sense to start by moving this page to perhaps [[Alignment key (SLASH'EM)]]? --[[User:Umbire the Phantom|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom|talk]]) 07:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Either that, or combine them into one article with the variant-specific articles being redirects to the appropriate section, like we have with [[Cthulhu]]. We currently have both approaches on the wiki ([[object materials]] being an example of the approach you're suggesting), and I don't think either is strictly better or worse than the other. Either way, I agree we shouldn't have just the SLASH'EM-specific info at the main article. [[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate|talk]]) 05:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:40, 6 October 2022
Removing alignment keys from the game
If I recall correctly, putting them in a bag of holding and then exploding the bag will remove the alignment keys and print a message. Wouldn't it be better if they resisted being put in a container? --Bluescreenofdeath (talk) 10:43, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Rename
Given that both the alignment keys and quests are present in different branches of NetHack variants, would it make sense to start by moving this page to perhaps Alignment key (SLASH'EM)? --Umbire the Phantom (talk) 07:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- Either that, or combine them into one article with the variant-specific articles being redirects to the appropriate section, like we have with Cthulhu. We currently have both approaches on the wiki (object materials being an example of the approach you're suggesting), and I don't think either is strictly better or worse than the other. Either way, I agree we shouldn't have just the SLASH'EM-specific info at the main article. Ion frigate (talk) 05:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
