Talk:Material

Table Orientation

Can the table orientation be changed from 1 material per row to 1 material per column? I’m thinking of something similar to Object materials (SpliceHack). —Aximili (talk) 08:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Maybe, I'll look into it at some point. --Umbire the Phantom (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Please be so kind and don't touch the table. It barely fits as it is, as we can see from edit. I am afraid we break it. It is very delicate see History:

(cur | prev) 2015-08-28T17:37:06‎ Train (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,724 bytes) (+739)‎ . . (→‎List of all materials: Rearranging into a table. A tight fit, but there's just room enough.)

We should leave the undefined NO_OBJECT to the table in case DT needs it for something in the future.

Rivest–Shamir–Adleman (talk) 23:26, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

...first of all this is a four-year-old post.

Second, yes, I am in fact well aware that it just barely fits and consider it to be the entire problem: if we reconfigure the table to be properly constructed, then we don't have to worry about that. --Umbire the Phantom (talk) 01:30, 22 July 2026 (UTC)