User:Phol ende wodan

Hi there, I'm Phol ende wodan, more commonly known as aosdict on NAO (stats, games, deaths, dumplogs, ttyrecs) (and also on hardfought.org) and on IRC as aosdict or aos. If you want to contact me, messaging me on IRC is a good bet, but you can also leave a message on my talk page and I'll probably see it soon after.

Design

I enjoy discussing NetHack game design, and frequently talk about it in the #hardfought channel on Freenode. My biggest ongoing project is listening to the design discussions that happen on IRC and sifting through them to find new ideas, or YANIs. I maintain several pages on this wiki cataloguing all the ones I know of:

• Huge archive of YANIs discussed on IRC
• Archive of YASIs from discussion on IRC, much less serious
• My personal YANIs, not discussed by multiple people

Over time, I've also written some lists/essays about problems I see in vanilla and how they could be addressed.

• Balance issues: a large list/essay describing balance problems in vanilla and possible solutions to them
• Frustration issues: a list of frustrating and not fun elements in vanilla

I've also gotten into the habit of writing long-form proposals that focus on overhauling one specific (but usually significant) part of the game.

• Proposal to rearrange monster letters and colors (complete)
• Proposal for quest level/monster/flavor redesign (complete)
• Proposal for a replacement of the combat system (mostly complete)
• Proposal to rebalance NetHack's skill system (incomplete)
• Proposal to add the Bard as a distinct and well-balanced role (incomplete)

And lastly, I have written up some comments on the proposals of others:

• Comments on jonadab's dungeon overhaul proposal
• Comments on ais523's dungeon overhaul proposal

Playing NetHack

I primarily play vanilla 3.6 with a sprinkling of some variant play for Junethack. I have 20-30 vanilla ascensions in all 13 roles, most of which are on NAO, as well as one ascension each for UnNetHack (vampire wizard), GruntHack (dwarven valkyrie) and NetHack 4 (elven wizard). Probably need to get into FIQhack, Fourk, and dNetHack at some point, too.

Design principles

These are some design principles I try to follow.

The Interhack Principle: If the player can fix a problem by wrapping the game in a better UI, that problem should not be in the game.

• Forgetting maps and discoveries from amnesia violates this; one could create a windowport or other interface that will automatically restore them, mitigating its effect.
• Stunning does not violate this; no matter how good the interface is it cannot predict whether the player's next move will take them in the correct direction.

The Consumable/Renewable Principle: When consumable and renewable resources provide similar effects, the effects of the consumable resources should generally be stronger.

• The spell of haste self violates this; when cast at Skilled it provides very fast speed for a renewable 15 energy. The potion of speed gives the same effect, but consumes a potion.
• The spell of magic mapping (narrowly) does not violate this; the blessed effect of the scroll detects secret doors, which the spell cannot do at all.

The DevTeam Thinks Of Everything: Provide non-standard behavior in every conceivable situation where the player might expect non-standard behavior.

Keystroke Consistency: Entering the same keystrokes should always do the same thing, independent of context.

• The eat command violates this; pressing "ey" while standing on a corpse (eat the corpse) has different behavior from pressing it otherwise (eat the item in slot y).

High Headroom: When the player faces a strategic problem, they are not punished heavily for picking a single suboptimal choice.

• The level of headroom is, of course, up to the designers, but NetHack and all its variants tend to be very high-headroom games.

Verb + Noun: The game allows you to try to perform any action on anything.

Flavoring: Everything in the game should have a justification for why it belongs in the game.