Difference between revisions of "User talk:Feagradze"
(welcoming new contributor) |
m (Text replace - "Wikihack" to "NetHackWiki") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Welcome!== | ==Welcome!== | ||
[[Image:Welcome.png|right|thumb|109px|''Welcome!'']] | [[Image:Welcome.png|right|thumb|109px|''Welcome!'']] | ||
| − | Hi! Welcome, and thanks for contributing to | + | Hi! Welcome, and thanks for contributing to NetHackWiki! |
| − | *'''The [[ | + | *'''The [[NetHackWiki:How to help|How to help]]''' and '''[[NetHackWiki:Style guide|Style guide]]''' pages are excellent starting points. |
*'''[[Special:Recentchanges|Recent changes]]''' is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help. | *'''[[Special:Recentchanges|Recent changes]]''' is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help. | ||
| − | *'''Questions? Need help?''' You can ask on [[Forum:Help_desk|Help Desk forum]], on [[User talk:Tjr|my talk page]], at the [[ | + | *'''Questions? Need help?''' You can ask on [[Forum:Help_desk|Help Desk forum]], on [[User talk:Tjr|my talk page]], at the [[NetHackWiki:Community Portal|Community Portal]] or on the [[Help:Talk page|talk page]] associated with each article! Just remember to sign those posts with four tildes: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. That will expand to create a signature. |
I'm really happy to have you here, and look forward to working with you! -- [[User:Tjr|Tjr]] ([[User_talk:Tjr|Talk]]) 23:40, June 25, 2010 | I'm really happy to have you here, and look forward to working with you! -- [[User:Tjr|Tjr]] ([[User_talk:Tjr|Talk]]) 23:40, June 25, 2010 | ||
''Note: This is an automatic greeting.'' | ''Note: This is an automatic greeting.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==An idea for charts== | ||
| + | Along the lines of all the damage charts you've been making, what do you think of the idea of making a comparative damage chart, either for [[weapon]] or [[artifact weapon]]? It would be a great way to actually back up assertions like "Grayswandir is the best weapon in the game" or "Snickersnee and Excalibur are about the same," which have been on the wiki forever. I'd do it myself, but I don't know how to make those pretty charts. Anyway, just a thought I had... -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 09:32, July 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :<p>A great idea (could name the page "[[Comparison of artifact weapons]]" and include a few nonartifact high damage things, like a [[mattock]], [[crysknife]], etc), though something that's been bugging me about that (for another page I had in mind) is artifacts that have a chance of [[Vorpal blade|instant death]]. It's so quirky it makes it incredibly hard to rate (though it is indeed possible).</p><p>I was hoping of going around and making a spreadsheet that compares the damage of small/large, to try and tell, statistically speaking, which is the best (version one would almost certainly exclude things like that). This would also correctly rate, say, [[Trollsbane]] as being ever-so-slightly better than a normal [[long sword]]. (Basically, it's a weighted average, with the weight being the "encounter level" or whatever it's called of the monsters).</p><p>Odd things like [[magic resistance]] or [[automatic searching]] would be outright impossible, however.</p> [[User:Feagradze|Feagradze]] 10:13, July 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Also: it's not really all that hard, it's just annoying, if that makes any sense. Wikipedia has a [[wikipedia:Math markup|great explanation]] of the <pre><math></math></pre> command. If you get something wrong, though, boy does it give some scary error messages (though they're harmless) in ''flaming red text.''<br>I'll get around to finishing those off probably within a week. [[User:Feagradze|Feagradze]] 10:13, July 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:23, 11 November 2010
Welcome!
Hi! Welcome, and thanks for contributing to NetHackWiki!
- The How to help and Style guide pages are excellent starting points.
- Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.
- Questions? Need help? You can ask on Help Desk forum, on my talk page, at the Community Portal or on the talk page associated with each article! Just remember to sign those posts with four tildes: ~~~~. That will expand to create a signature.
I'm really happy to have you here, and look forward to working with you! -- Tjr (Talk) 23:40, June 25, 2010
Note: This is an automatic greeting.
An idea for charts
Along the lines of all the damage charts you've been making, what do you think of the idea of making a comparative damage chart, either for weapon or artifact weapon? It would be a great way to actually back up assertions like "Grayswandir is the best weapon in the game" or "Snickersnee and Excalibur are about the same," which have been on the wiki forever. I'd do it myself, but I don't know how to make those pretty charts. Anyway, just a thought I had... -Ion frigate 09:32, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
A great idea (could name the page "Comparison of artifact weapons" and include a few nonartifact high damage things, like a mattock, crysknife, etc), though something that's been bugging me about that (for another page I had in mind) is artifacts that have a chance of instant death. It's so quirky it makes it incredibly hard to rate (though it is indeed possible).
I was hoping of going around and making a spreadsheet that compares the damage of small/large, to try and tell, statistically speaking, which is the best (version one would almost certainly exclude things like that). This would also correctly rate, say, Trollsbane as being ever-so-slightly better than a normal long sword. (Basically, it's a weighted average, with the weight being the "encounter level" or whatever it's called of the monsters).
Odd things like magic resistance or automatic searching would be outright impossible, however.
Feagradze 10:13, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Also: it's not really all that hard, it's just annoying, if that makes any sense. Wikipedia has a great explanation of the
<math></math>
command. If you get something wrong, though, boy does it give some scary error messages (though they're harmless) in flaming red text.
I'll get around to finishing those off probably within a week. Feagradze 10:13, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
