Talk:The Banes

From NetHackWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Move section on Puddingbane?

Perhaps Puddingbane ought to be moved to its own page and then linked to from the top of this one? (Or simply incorporated into the Pudding farming page) After all, Puddingbane is unlike all of the rest of the artifacts on this page as it doesn't reduce the chance of getting a more useful artifact by existing, as it isn't an artifact; it also doesn't deal double damage, rather the reverse in fact. 04:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

This page should be split up and reduced to a disambiguation page. "The Banes" are linked solely by being called Foobane, and half the weapons listed here aren't even that! Also, welcome to NetHackWiki, 65'; could you please create an account? :-) --Jayt 11:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Does Cyclops count as a giant?

My healer gets Giantslayer pretty often, I mean, and it'd be nice to know whether it did double damage on his quest nemesis or not.

- Potman (Guest) 10 December 2006

Cyclops and Lord Surtur count as giants in this case. I've updated the article now. --ZeroOne 21:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

How to fix the Banes? Perhaps skewing generation towards the monster you can now kill more easily, and a small chance of risk-free non-exploding enchantment for each one killed.--PeterGFin 13:31, January 9, 2010 (UTC)