NetHackWiki:Community Portal

NetHackWiki About NetHackWiki, WikiNode

Copyrights, Disclaimers Policy, Scope Style guide, How to help Administrators

Categories, Templates Stubs, SLASH'EM stubs Current projects, Wanted pages Pages to be improved, Pages to be merged, Pages to be deleted Advanced search

Welcome! Use this page to discuss general topics with WikiHack members.

Another way to contact Wikihack is to send mail to our mailing list, or leave comments on the talk pages of individual users.

Other NetHack communities include:

• rec.games.roguelike.nethack - the newsgroup, see rgrn
• #nethack on irc.freenode.net - see Freenode

Archives of this page: 1, 2

Post a new section

New javascript-based monster template

As was discussed a while ago, I've created a new template, currently at {{test}}, which combines the short and long form of the monster infoboxes, toggling between them with some javascript at MediaWiki:Monobook.js. You can see it in action on killer bee, if you make sure to clear your cache first. I've tested it on Firefox, Opera and Konqueror, but it doesn't appear to work on IE6 at the moment. Can someone else confirm that? I think the problem is with the following code:

if (window.addEventListener)
window.addEventListener("load", createNavigationBarToggleButton, false)
else if (window.attachEvent)
window.attachEvent("onload", createNavigationBarToggleButton)
else if (document.getElementById)
window.LoadOff=createNavigationBarToggleButton;

but I have no idea what it is. Help! I'm not a programmer! --Jayt 23:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

It is code to try to tell the createNavigationBarToggleButton function to run after the document loads (so that document.getElementById can find everything). The code did work when I found a copy of IE6 to test it on, but that was after you put in the missing semicolons. Meanwhile, I decided to replace that code with "addOnloadHook( createNavigationBarToggleButton );" which calls an addOnloadHook function from http://nethack.wikia.com/skins3/common/wikibits.js?1, which loads before MediaWiki:Monobook.js does. By using addOnloadHook, our code runs before some of MediaWiki's own code, so there is less delay before the "Show detail" link shows up. --Kernigh 00:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, this is a much tidier solution. But there are still two or three people in #nethack who can't see the "Show details" link, even on almost identical setups to mine (Firefox 1.5.0.5 on Kubuntu). Their cache was cleared. I've tested it successfully on Firefox, IE6, Opera and Konqueror, on Kubuntu and Windows. Any ideas what could be going wrong? --Jayt 11:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Strangely, killer bee now works beautifully for me (I'm one of the Firefox 1.5.0.5 on Kubuntu guys). None of the pages have been edited since it was last broken, and I haven't done anything special, so I have no clue why it suddenly started working, or indeed, why it was broken in the first place. --Eidolos 17:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

I observed the same situation on Firefox 1.5.something on same computer as IE6. I think that it might have went away when I logged in with Firefox (as I already was logged in with IE). I heard once that Wikia might use a server-side cache for anonymous users (not for logged-in users who have their name on every page), a setup that might be like one at Wikimedia. Possibly that caused it. --Kernigh 19:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Fascinating... I will test on a few more setups and ask around for results, but assuming it works as plans, what do you all think about replacing {{monster}} with {{test}}? I deliberately made the rolled-up version very very brief. I replaced Base level with Difficulty, which I now understand to be a good general summary of the monster's... difficulty (see RGRN)! The game uses it to determine which monsters to generate for a given level.

Finally, I made the full table display by default, for when JS is not working/available. Does anybody notice a flicker when the page is first loaded, or will that JS always execute before the page is rendered for the first time? --Jayt 01:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

There's no noticeable flicker here, and even if there was I wouldn't mind. I think resistances conveyed by eating should be in the hidden-details table as well; it's sufficiently useful information. (Also we should give percentages on how often each resistance is conveyed by that monster, but that's neither here nor there). --Eidolos 19:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I've tested Killer bee in eLinks, my other browser of choice (a member of the lynx family, no JS support). I notice that both the small and large tables are visible. Would it be practical to only output the small table using JS? I've also tested in JS-disabled Firefox 1.0, and the show/hide link becomes an empty table row. This actually makes it look nicer - a visual separator between need-to-know and nice-to know. --Stefanor 00:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Would it be practical to only output the small table using JS? That's what it does; a browser without JS will inevitably see both tables, unless it also supports CSS. --Jayt 12:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Addendum

Addendum: Oops, I've now realised that the template won't work when more than one copy of it is on a page, which we should probably have on pages like Mummy. I'll have a think about this later. --Jayt 01:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Okaaay, I think I have it working. Except I'm running into the same cache problem, so I'm going to wait and see if it magically starts working later. --Jayt 12:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Try logging out and then back to Wikia. That should clear the cache. --ZeroOne 15:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

No, it is not the cache. It does not work in Firefox nor Opera on my Mac. I have now moved to my OpenBSD box (so I can use Konqueror's JavaScript debugger). So far, the createShowHideButtons function seems to be broken; calling it from a debugger acts as if the function does not exist. I am still investigating if we have a syntax problem. --Kernigh 17:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Well, the debugger is giving me old code. It turns out that [1] gives me old code even if I reload it. So there is a cache, but not the same cache. This is might be MediaWiki's internal cache (the one that we reset with action=purge, but I have no way to purge this one), not the anonymous-users cache. --Kernigh 17:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Update: since I really have no idea what the problem is, I am waiting for help in #wikia on Freenode. --Kernigh 20:03, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Whatever problem there was seems to have cleared up now. Does the template not work for anybody? --Jayt 12:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

CSS

There is also the matter of the new code requiring more divs. I haven't yet discovered a way to make these shrink-wrap to the point of invisibility, so that's why there's an extra grey border. Could somebody please fiddle with the template ({{test}}) until the border looks good? :-) --Jayt 12:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Final comments

I have made several improvements. Here's an example of the final result:

a killer bee
Difficulty	5
Attacks	Sting 1d3 poisonous

a killer bee
Difficulty	5
Attacks	Sting 1d3 poisonous
Base level	1
Base experience	19
Speed	18
Base AC	-1
Base MR	0
Alignment	0 (neutral)
Frequency (by normal means)	Rare, appears in large groups
Genocidable	Yes
Weight	1
Nutritional value	5
Size	Tiny
Resistances	Poison
Resistances conveyed	Poison (30%)
A killer bee: is poisonous can fly is an animal has no hands is female

If there are no complaints, I will replace the {{monster}} template soon. --Jayt 13:38, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I don't think the "A killer bee:" line of the attributes is at all necessary. Otherwise, looks pretty good on this end, good work! --Eidolos 16:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Once the new monster template goes live, I'll see what I can do about automatically uploading the rest of the monster species with User:Eidobot. --Eidolos 21:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

It's at {{monster}} now. I suggest the line "A killer bee:" is included to make the lines in the attributes box complete sentences. And yes, an automated upload would be nice! --Jayt 12:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Google Analytics

(Wikihack has been a bit flaky for the last few days. The Wikia admins are aware of it. I'm sure they're doing something about it.)

I sent some Google Analytics javascript code to User:Jasonr; hopefully he'll put it in the right place soon and we'll have a better idea of which pages people actually read. --Jayt 12:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

• coff* The trouble with Google Analytics is that it runs in scripts on the pages that use it, and they're linked directly from Google's domain. Anyone using a script blocker probably blocks it - and anyone who is worried about security and uses Firefox will probably have NoScript. :[ (addendum by Michael Martin, unregistered reader; 9:10, 13 October 2006)

Perhaps, but it's better than nothing. Although Wikia are being reticent about GA, so I suspect they don't want us to see the stats anyway. --Jayt 17:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Item drops?

I'm not sure what article or template would fit this best, but I think it'd be good if we had a list of which monsters tend to carry/drop which items. (For instance, nymphs often carry mirrors and a potion of object detection; gnomes carry an aklys, etc.) If this already exists, I think it should be consolidated somewhere. Lotte 00:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

I do not know if wehave such an article yet, but one can use the m_initinv function at makemon.c#line487 as a reference. --Kernigh 00:28, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

The death-dropped item is random, but there is a spoiler here listing which items monsters can start with. It would make a nice wiki article, but you might want to contact Boudewijn before copying it wholesale (it doesn't carry a copyright notice). --Jayt 12:14, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Never knew that existed, thanks. (I wasn't planning to include deathdrops in the list). I'd imagine the source code would be a decent reference, but if needed we could contact him. Lotte 17:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Instructional ttyrecs

ala Eidolos'? Castle with instrument, Kaen, maybe a newb one,... ideas? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stumbly (talk • contribs) 25 September 2006

What about instructional ttyrecs? I don't think those can be uploaded to this wiki, if that's what you are asking. But creating an article with a list of those and links to them may be a good idea, although I don't know where to find them in the first place... Maybe just by searching the r.g.r.n? --ZeroOne 13:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Multiple entities on one page

We currently don't have any guidelines for when multiple entities should be documented in a single wiki article. For example, mithril-coat contains both elven and dwarvish varieties; Dragon contains all dragons; mimic contains all mimics; and there may be more. This can be good infodesign, but I suggest:

1. Two entities (weapon, tool, monster, ...) should only be on the same page if there is useful commentary that spans them both.
2. To emphasise that the two entities are in fact separate game objects:
   • each should have its own ==section==, and
   • each should have a dedicated infobox ({{weapon}}, {{tool}}, {{monster}}, ...).

The Banes fails the first point. I suggest it is broken up and redirected to bane, a disambiguation page.

Dragon will need 9 sections and 9 infoboxes to comply with the second point (I think baby dragons are sufficiently different to need a separate page); putting "see article" under Attacks really defeats the point of an infobox.

Any objections or comments before I add this advice to the style guide? --Jayt 17:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The reason Dragon is set up as it is is because almost all of the information in the infobox is completely identical between the different types of dragon. We do not need nine infoboxes containing largely the same information - it is horribly redundant. I am thinking separate infoboxes should only be used if there are substantial differences between entities (as with the mimics, Keystone Kops, the Yendorian Army, etc. -- SGrunt 18:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Sure it's redundant, but Wikihack is a massively redundant enterprise, all for the sake of usability. Firstly, when people look up info on a monster, they could read the current dragon template and ignore the non-relevant bits, or they could dig through mon1-343.txt, but I think the very purpose of an infobox is to document exactly one thing. Secondly, I don't think dragons really are similar enough to justify making an exception to the normal use of infoboxes: there are three fields in the current box saying "see article", and of course there's no monster with the name "dragon". It gets worse when the attributes list is added (yellow and green dragons are acidic and poisonous, respectively and uniquely). --Jayt 22:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Any further comments on this from anyone? I will leave Dragon alone for now if it's a major objection, SGrunt. --Jayt 11:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Logical colour templates

In the spirit of Template:Black and CLR_BLACK, I'm tempted to create a set of colour templates corresponding to HI_LEATHER, HI_METAL etc. from color.h. This would make transcribing infoboxes from source easier, and would insulate us from potential changes. Not sure whether I'd call them "leather color" or "HI_LEATHER", though. Any thoughts? --Killian 02:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I see no reason not to use {{leather}}, {{silver}}, {{organic}}, {{metal}}, etc.. They won't interfere with similarly titled pages in the article namespace, and this seems as good a use for them as any. Also, has any object ever changed colour? --Jayt 14:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Ah, but I see now that you've already done it :-) --Jayt 15:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Another tweak to the monster template

=
Name	giant beetle
Appearance	random
Base price	{{{cost}}} zm
Weight	3
Probability out of rings	3.57%
Probability out of items in:
containers	Rogue level	Gehennom	Elsewhere
0.179%	0.179%	0.286%	0.107%

I put the monster's name on the top row for an even more compact table, as originally envisaged by PraetorFenix. Any reason I shouldn't merge this into the {{monster}} template? --Jayt 15:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• I would support this - it gives a proper title to the monster box. -- SGrunt 19:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Internal names for article titles

I have moved several articles (Bell of Opening, Candelabrum of Invocation, Dark One, etc.) from titles prefixed with The to those without to match the internal names specified for those entities. My justifications for this are as follows:

1. Pages generated with the assistance of tools (e.g. Monster) will point at the internal name and therefore a large number of links will point at the article with the internal title.
2. As it stands, the majority of links pointing to the articles in question already point to the internal title (possibly as a consequence of the above).

If there is any rationale for preficing the articles with the unnecessary "The", please state it here. -- SGrunt 19:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. Quest artifacts are the exception - they are prefixed with The in artilist.h. --Jayt 21:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Hence why I've left them where they are. -- SGrunt 01:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Extra linebreaks in infobox templates

I noticed there was a problem with some of the infobox templates: if you placed them in their own paragraph, before the first paragraph of the article, there was too much vertical space before the text itself. Turns out this was caused by having a linebreak between the end of the template body and the <noinclude> tag. Removing the linebreak in the template solved the problem, so it's no longer necessary to put the template-include in the same paragraph as the article introduction (which is what I've had to do recently). --Killian 12:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Linking to Wikipedia

I added links to Wikipedia articles K-ration and C-ration into our own K-ration and C-ration articles. I only did this because it isn't clear, what these things are actually supposed to be, and Wikipedia has some interesting background on them. The reason I am posting to Community Portal now is to prevent anyone from thinking that hey, it might be a good idea to add that template to all articles. If it isn't clear yet, I am strongly against adding {{wikipedia}} to all articles. Everyone knows, for example, what a dog, a tin opener or an apple is like. That is, I think the Wikipedia-link template should be used sparingly. --ZeroOne 21:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

• Agreed. The {{wikipedia}} template should only be used when it's not at all clear what something is, such as in the case of some of the demons, or perhaps to provide background on famous monster appearing in the game as a unique (such as Ashikaga Takauji). -- SGrunt 00:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• (The interwiki prefix to Wikipedia is "wikipedia:" – "w:" points to Central Wikia. I fixed the two links above. --Kernigh 04:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC))

Incomplete

A lot of monsters are missing from the Wikihack database. I was wondering if anyone could fix this problem. I'd also love to know what wizard lock does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pokemonman (talk • contribs) 9 December 2006

Concerning wizard lock, I just now gave to it a wiki article. --Kernigh 05:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Random page function

I'm not sure if this is the place to post this, so feel free to move it if its not. It might be nice to stop the random page function from including source code... there's so much source code that more often than not you end up reading some random file from some random revision of the game, which most people using the "Random page" link aren't really intending to see. Just my thoughts on it. -- Intx13 20:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

As far as I know, the only simple way to accomplish this would be to move it to a different namespace (like the User: and Wikihack: namespaces - call it "Source:"?). 64.218.194.120 15:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Cultural references

Is there any kind list (like in en-wiki [2]) or something else here for cultural references in NetHack? I haven't found one myself, and it would really help me with the Finnish counterpart in Wikipedia.

[3] - Wikiproject NetHack in Finnish Wikipedia

[4] - My usersite in Finnish Wikipedia

No, I don't think we have an equivalent list. But just browse the articles, they've got links to single Wikipedia articles for more background of their topics. --ZeroOne 23:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for information.

NetHack sources on wikihack and Special:Random

IMO, Special:Random is not very useful for most users, because there's so many source code articles, and those simply aren't interesting for the majority of people.

I talked with some admins on the #wikia irc channel, and asked if there's a way to prevent the random page-link from showing the source code articles. Answer: move the pages to another namespace. The end result was that there's now a new namespace on wikia: Source

I suggest we move all the source code to the Source -namespace. --Paxed 17:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

There are, of course, a lot of source code pages. Your idea is a good one, but we should get a bot to do the moves, to complete the task in a reasonable time and avoid flooding the Recent Changes list. --Ray Chason 22:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

I made a bot-readable list of source code articles to help give this idea some impetus :-) [5] It doesn't include everything from Category:Source code, just those matching /.*\.[ch]$/ (which I think is what we want?) Let me know on User talk:GreyKnight if you want something different. --User:GreyKnight(as anon) (PS: will be back on IRC sometime soon, see y'all there!)

---

Then the problem was to find someone with a bot that would move the pages. I discussed this with Paxed in the #nethack channel. I managed to configure a pywikipediabot to use User:Kernigh bot. I tested the bot by moving User:Kernigh/sandbox to User:Kernigh/sandcastle. Then Paxed converted GreyKnight's list into a shell script of python movepages.py -from:"x" -to:"y"; sleep 30 commands [6]. Before I run these commands, I need Wikia staff to give a bot flag to User:Kernigh bot to hide the huge number of moves from recent changes.

I now propose that User:Kernigh bot receive a bot flag, run the commands, thus moving the source code pages into the Source: namespace. Is this okay, or does someone not want this to happen? --Kernigh 21:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. Now when I want to learn about something random in NetHack, all I have to do is hit alt-shift-x :) Fredil Yupigo 21:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm obviously all for this. --Paxed 07:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

So when is this mass move going to happen? Fredil Yupigo 01:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

As soon as someone with a bot-flagged username runs the script through a bot... Kernigh, probably. --paxed 08:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I requested the bot flag (through Special:Contact, with a reference to this section of the community portal) and received the bot flag. A few hours ago, User:Kernigh bot began to move pages. The bot sleeps 30 seconds between moves. So far, the bot seems to work correctly. --Kernigh 00:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

There's also slashem sources on wikihack, those should be moved too... here's a S'em 0.0.7E7F2 move script: [7] --paxed 15:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Paxed, your script has extra lines between the .h and .c moves. --Kernigh 16:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Fixed. --paxed 16:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I will have User:Kernigh bot run the script, probably at Friday 7 March. --Kernigh 15:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Monsters which are also starting races

My concern is that these are handled inconsistently. Most notably the standard dwarf (monster) h is missing altogether. I am hoping someone responsible can decide upon a suitable convention and apply it across Wikihack.

The dwarf (monster) todo page I created provides the relevant links. I apologise for the fact I couldn't fix it myself.--PeterGFin 14:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

The problem with MR

For the MR topic, it records only the MR of the player and not of the monster. I have no idea what base MR does for monster (well, some ideas, but not enough). Someone ought to add something about that. RegalStar 18:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Modifying NetHack

Can someone make a small guide? There's only one guide I can find, http://failsure.net:8085/root/usr/src/pub/games/nethack/vms/vmsbuild.com , but it doesn't tell you how make a new class. Also, I need to know how to use makedefs. I try to run it, but it flashes for a second saying it has invalid arguments (0). It doesn't even say how to use it. (FYI, my source and tools are installed in C:\nh343\ and C:\MinGW\)

By-the-way, here's the code I'm using:

Roles.c, under the bit about ranger:

/* START: BETA: Detective */
{	{"Detective", 0}, {
	{"Detective", 0},
	{"Detective", 0},
	{"Detective", 0},
	{"Detective", 0},
	{"Detective", 0},
	{"Detective", 0},
	{"Detective", 0},
	{"Detective", 0},
	{"Detective", 0} },
	"God", "God", "God", /* God */
	"Det", "someplace 1", "someplace 2",
	PM_RANGER, NON_PM, PM_BOMB_DOG,
	PM_ORION, PM_HUNTER, PM_SCORPIUS,
	PM_FOREST_CENTAUR, PM_SCORPION, S_CENTAUR, S_SPIDER,
	ART_LONGBOW_OF_DIANA,
	MH_HUMAN|MH_ELF|MH_GNOME|MH_ORC | ROLE_MALE|ROLE_FEMALE |
	  ROLE_NEUTRAL|ROLE_CHAOTIC,
	/* Str Int Wis Dex Con Cha */
	{  13, 13, 13,  9, 13,  7 },
	{  30, 10, 10, 20, 20, 10 },
	/* Init   Lower  Higher */
	{ 13, 0,  0, 6,  1, 0 },	/* Hit points */
	{  1, 0,  0, 1,  0, 1 },12,	/* Energy */
	10, 9, 2, 1, 10, A_INT, SPE_INVISIBILITY,   -4
},
/* END: BETA: Detective */

Roles.c, above the knight and samurai's hello thing:

	case PM_DETECTIVE:
	    return ("Here's the thing");        /* -- A. Monk */

Monst.c, under the large dog code:

/* START: BETA: BOMB DOG */
    MON("bomb dog", S_DOG,
	LVL(6, 15, 4, 0, 0), (G_GENO|1),
	A(ATTK(AT_BITE, AD_PHYS, 2, 4),
	  NO_ATTK, NO_ATTK, NO_ATTK, NO_ATTK, NO_ATTK),
	SIZ(800, 250, 0, MS_BARK, MZ_MEDIUM), 0, 0,
	M1_ANIMAL|M1_NOHANDS|M1_CARNIVORE,
	M2_STRONG|M2_DOMESTIC, M3_INFRAVISIBLE, HI_DOMESTIC),
/* END: BETA: BOMB DOG */

Monst.c, under the ranger code:

/* END: BETA: Detective */
    MON("detective", S_HUMAN,
	LVL(10, 12, 10, 2, -3), G_NOGEN,
	A(ATTK(AT_WEAP, AD_PHYS, 1, 4),
	  NO_ATTK, NO_ATTK, NO_ATTK, NO_ATTK, NO_ATTK),
	SIZ(WT_HUMAN, 400, 0, MS_HUMANOID, MZ_HUMAN), 0, 0,
	M1_HUMANOID|M1_OMNIVORE,
	M2_NOPOLY|M2_HUMAN|M2_STRONG|M2_COLLECT, M3_INFRAVISIBLE,
	HI_DOMESTIC),
/* END: BETA: Detective */

How would I make it so a class has a revolver (the archilogiest had one, or am I just thinking that Indy had one, so Archy must have one? XD) and wipes (which I'd have to program in myself).

Also, are there any really interesting points in the code? Like, I'd like to keep the game from deleting your save when you die.

TBF02 06:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Weapon damages and min-max values, use template?

I saw someone added the minimum and maximum damages that Vorpal Blade and Battle-axe could do to their artifact/weapon template. I decided to write a template that could calculate those automagically given the d notation: See User:Paxed/Template:dice. Opinions, do we want to use it? (I'm obviously all for it) --paxed 15:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Monster (Pet) equipment - info box template?

I'm new to contributing: I'm not sure exactly how the info punched into the monster box on the right comes out the way it does. Take the entry for Djinni: the box at the right has an "other attributes" section that lists in bullet points that a Djinni has a head, arms, and a torso, that it can pick up weapons, etc., but in the edit section it just has some values set.

What I'd like to see is very specific information about exactly what equipment a monster can equip, especially after it has been tamed. For example, I had a pet Djinni, and it could wear a shield and gloves as well, and I believe it was equipping a cloak, but it wouldn't take any armor. I would have thought something that can wear a cloak could wear body armor. Without a wand of probing, I couldn't tell if it had something cursed on or if it simply couldn't equip it.

It'd be nice to see some consistent section on what equipment a monster will use as a pet, something like:

Centaur Can equip: Weapon Shield Helmet Gloves Amulet of Lifesaving Can use: Unicorn Horn Potion of Gain Level

Would it be possible to have the exact information on what a pet can equip converted from those values entered in the template - are these values/flags consistent, do they apply across the board? Or does every monster have it's own equipment rules?

If the latter is true, and it would be too complicated to work into the template, can anyone point to the best resource where I can find specifics on what a pet will wear and use? I'm thinking about adding an "As a Pet" section at the bottom of monster articles as I fool around with Polymorph traps. Floatingeye 04:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

The monster template is at Template:Monster. But the thing you're looking at is actually an inner template, Template:Attributes. The things in that template are lifted straight from the source code. Source:Monflag.h contains all the flags. Take a look at the djinni: Monst.c#line2782. The flag "humanoid" says that your djinni has all the usual human bits, so it is a mystery why he wouldn't wear armor.

Templates are tricky, so if you want to improve them, I suggest trying to talk to Shijun or Paxed, since they've worked on them recently. #nethack on IRC is probably a good way to find people.

-Mniot 05:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Theme change

What the heck happened to the theme? How do I get the old look back? -- Killian 15:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Kirkburn changed it. Did he talk with the sysops/whatever of wikihack about it first?! --paxed 16:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll use Special:Contact to complain about this, maybe others should do so too... --paxed 18:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

He didn't contact me at any rate. I could change it back, if there's a clear consensus for doing so. Anyway, if you're logged in, you'll see a small button marked MORE next to your name at the top right. Click that, and select "My preferences". (This link should also work.) Click the Skin tab on the resulting screen, and you can change the theme. The old look is "MonoBook" and you'll find it toward the bottom.--Ray Chason 18:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

See Talk:Main Page#Monaco skin for more. Kirkburn (talk) 18:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)